FANDOM


Chat Mod

First, unsuccessful (14/01/2012)

Im allways on chat im a trusted friendly user and i will only ban after giving two warnings so i think i would be a good chat moderator.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Support

  • Strongly support - Clone is/was a good chat mod and deserves to be again. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:36, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support well if hes going to get to admin he at least needs to be a chat mod Prisinorzero 10:54, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support- he edits a lot and helps the wiki. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster
    • How has that got to do with Chat mod? He also may have been the reason it was closed. Request to strike that vote. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 05:23, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Not yet. - CJC 14:03, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • He was one already --RaceLord 07:48, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
    • No. He was stripped his power due to it being reopened. Many users did not get back their chatmod rights. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 07:58, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
      • ya but i think know poeple should be Chat Mods --RaceLord 08:10, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • User can be very mature at *some* times, but may sometimes stray to a "less-mature" state. Maybe mature a little more, and we can see what we can do. :) User:Skdhjf/SigT 05:27, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Strong oppose he is sometimes mean. User:Darth henry/Sig 13:30, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose a very short fuse sometimes on chat. Also not a good idea considering all the drama at the LMBW. -King of Nynrah Talk 13:34, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Sorry, I like CGCJ, but I don't really trust him as a chat mod now. Especially considering how he was acting towards newbies up until recently and the chat rules at The Brickipedia Project Wiki. User:Berrybrick/Sig 13:54, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • I never made those chat rules Ba and Zero did.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
      • I didn't say you wrote them, I just said because of those rules. Anyway, then that would be a reason for me to oppose those twos' RfCM. User:Berrybrick/Sig 20:27, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose I like him, but I after everything that's happened recently, I'm no longer willing to trust him with rights. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Oppose (this is an oppose section- do we really need to all say oppose?). I don't know if I agree with "trusted" or "friendly" anymore, I really don't know what happened. Anyway, apparently insulting people on chat already. I don't know if this is true or not, but in the past, there seemed to be accusations like this constantly surrounding this user. User:Nighthawk leader/sig 23:55, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Template:No User has never been 100% trustable --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:03, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose I have to agree with you all. Sorry CGCJ, you're just hard to trust. User:1999bug/sig
  • Oppose - Sorry, we can't trust you with the privileges in light of some recent incidents. FB100Ztalkcontribs 02:12, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose No offense, CGCJ, but I think that you're a big reason why chat was closed. No offense, though. :) Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)

Comments


Second, successful (10/04/2012)

I think he'd be good and, this is a restart I removed opposes and supports. Please ad your opinion.

Support

*I trust him myself. He IS a good user, and very much mature. What happend on LMBW doesn't matter now. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:57, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

User has been rude to other users on chat, and has been disobeying some rules. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:18, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes. He should be a Chat Moderator. -Lego Whovian 09:02, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • yo can just look at his edits to see how vital he is to the wiki, he is experienced and is on chat often so why not --Brick bobby - It's a trap! 10:28, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, he'd be a fine Chat mod. -User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • He has matured on chat or more over I'VE matured on chat so he won't have to abuse his powers to unban me :P Prisinorzero 10:44, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Cgcj has been more than good on chat. He has matured and I think he would use his (might be) powers well. He is nice and helpful. I think he should be a mod for these reasons and the ones above! He has alot of edits to and has been on this wiki for a long time... --User:Sonofhades101/signature
  • --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • He is always on the chat, and he treats people well these days. --LEGOSpinjitzu 15:14, April 9, 2012 (UTC)LEGOSpinjitzu
  • Weak support He is ok. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 15:17, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - This guy is changing, and for the better. Just try not to screw things up. ;) User:Skdhjf/SigT 19:07, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, CGCJ has been humbled, and has matured a lot as a result. I've had several times where CGCJ's been bullied on chat but unable to sort it out by himself. Poor lad. Anyhow, I'd trust him with these rights now. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 19:22, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • 12 support :D Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Make that 13! He has been great ever since... whenever I started. Strong support! Creeper S
  • Per NHL. User:SKP4472/sig2 09:57, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I have 3 reason why he should be a chatmod, 1. Always on Chat, 2. Trusted User, 3. Very mature,

Bob bricksTalkBlog 100px

Neutral

  • Neutral - This is a bit...difficult. FB100Ztalkcontribs 04:26, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per FB. ~ CJC 21:13, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • While CGCJ has matured some, I still do not think I can trust him as a ChatMod. The system is much better now, and I know that if he misuses the rights, that they'll be removed much quicker. However, before, when he had them, he banned nearly anyone from the LMB Wiki, or any newbie that he didn't like. I don't think he'd do that again, but it was so bad that I don't think I could do anything but oppose this request. I hate to bring this up again, but he also participated in the vandalism on the LMBW. I wouldn't bring it up at all, except that I think it took him months to get to the point where he could be trusted to not do it again. I won't be upset if he does get the rights, being that they'll be removed if he misuses them. But, I still must oppose because of the above reasons. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
    • Well i would rather forget the vandalism of the lego message board wiki Clone gunner commander jedi talk
      • Yes, I know, that's why I hated to bring it up, but I do believe it was only about 2 months ago where I felt like I could trust you to not do it again. :( User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Not sure yet as he would more than likely misuse the rights, he seems mature but he goes off on newbies a lot and so fourth so yeah. Not that he is a bad user(he is great) but when it comes to chat no.-User:Jedi master sith/sig
  • Per Drew. User:CM4S/Sig
  • 4 oppose Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • If this passes, chat will be a disaster. No offense, but he is humorless and rather anti-social. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 13:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh, god help us--Ninjago9 22:41, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Were we not just having a fourm of why he should be blocked?--WCDDoherty 22:45, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
    • No we weren't, but we also had on for chzech and he's becoming an admin?
  • No. Banned for a week last month for swearing and trolling. Doesn't need these rights. User:Dataman1/sig 23:30, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've lost faith in CGCJ, He's got some things against users on other wikis, and some on here. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:18, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Czech and SSX. --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 04:48, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • I oppose because he's rude. In the chat room, he said some dirty stuff to me and some of the other people in there, and he just doesn't seem mature enough to be nominated. KatenVaughn 20:12, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Administrator

First, unsuccessful (10/17/2011)

Detailed explanation of why you are nominating this user/yourself for adminship.

Support

  • He's been on for a year now and has made more edits than most of the admins, yet he's not even a chat mod. I think he's seriously unappreciated with only 4 barnstars (three of them given to him this month by people shocked that he doesn't have any) created too many articles to count, a valid user to the wiki and a great person which any one on chat will agree and I'll support him till the very end CGCJ FOR ADMIN!!!!!! Prisinorzero (* ) Talk 18:43, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Go for it! Go Go Go! TreeSound, Master of Hearing 18:45, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • He has experience, and I think he would have the control and discipline to use these tools right. A great friend, he'd make a good administrator in my mind. Just keep calm on chat. :P -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:46, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • he is a very hard-worker, and is dedicated to this wiki. go cgcj! User:Darth henry/Sig 18:50, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Even though he is under-appreciated, this guy is a hared-working, fun-loving user who truley deserves adminship. TheDouter 15:00, October 17, 2011
And? Some people make 60+. o_O --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig1/2ish 03:55, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

--CollectableMinifig4Scientist 21:10, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

  • Character and maturity concerns. BF2 Talk 12:39, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • He's accepted the nomination, per chat. If anyone would like him to verify, then just comment. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:47, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • CGCJ FOR ADMIN (vote or die)
    • Just a note, he doesn't have rollback. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:57, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
      • then give it to him! User:Darth henry/Sig 18:59, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
        • Hmm...I WANT to vote for him, but I'm not entirely sure if I should..afterall..he knows my secret. He'd prebably ban me right away.

--CollectableMinifig4Scientist 19:28, October 17, 2011 (UTC)

  • Um..mh..hm..I'll get back to you on this. - Kingcjc 19:31, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Where's the detailed description of why he should be admin? --Berrybrick (Talk) | (Con.) 19:37, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Oh, now I see, he's underappreciated and has a lot of edits, not a good enough argument for me. --Berrybrick (Talk) | (Con.) 19:39, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
      • Yea, adminship is not a reward for good work... User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:34, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Has the user even accepted the nomination? User:Nighthawk leader/sig 23:53, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Top two comments. - Kingcjc 16:30, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

Second, successful (03/06/2012)

Right well here goes... I have been on here for about one and a half years now, I'm very active, I have 18,747 edits and the number just goes up, I'm very experienced here, I know the rules, I know how to correctly use admin rights from the help of the various wiki's I have made, Blocking should be used as a last resort and you should always warn users if they do something wrong, deleting should only be used for deleting spam or inappropriate pages (we do get quite a bit of these), I know people will oppose because of the incidences that have happened in the past involving me but I think I have matured since then.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Support

  1. The best editor and information hunter around. Great at solving any kind of user dispute. From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 09:03, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  2. The only bad thing CGCJ has ever done wrong on here was one or two outbursts, but would be a great admin here. --User:CzechMate/czech 06:53, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Some troubling history, but honestly, could benefit from the tools and I think he'll be able to use them well. It's not that big of a deal. User:Ajraddatz/sig 07:08, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Yeah, he has had a few temper problems, but he works hard enough on the wiki to deserve admin rights. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:32, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Awesome User! I actually don't know why he was not an Admin before! User:Irnakk/sig2
  6. Only 1 and a half years!?! Lot's of edits... Full Support! I should add, what Zero said. Go CGCJ! User:Sonofhades101/signature
  7. Per Ajr. User:Berrybrick/Sig 13:10, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I have nominated this user several times and I regret not doing it this time. Our images of the admins have changed, we do think of them more of the side of being able to control us and dictating our every move. But it is just an extension to editing rights, and no one needs them more than Clone. He must of added half our images here, he gets us all new information and rarely stops editing. But apart from that, he's a great friend, he's mostly on chat and will always be ready to help new editors get started. He is my best friend on this wiki and probably the most deserving non admin of these rights. - Zero
  9. Per Zero, he is an excellent user! :D --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 14:56, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Clone or me? Ah I know you mean me :P - Zero
  10. one of our biggest contributors, on a lot. He can use the rights--Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 15:28, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  11. Looks like we'll be having a fresh batch of admins soon! -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 16:17, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Will we be cookies, or doughnuts? --User:CzechMate/czech 22:37, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  12. Per KoN. User:SKP4472/sig2 16:28, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  13. I'm honestly a bit wary of this, but it's worth a shot. User:Cligra/Sig
  14. Per Cligra and Zero. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 16:49, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  15. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 20:56, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
  16. Being that he's proved that he's matured with his ChatMod rights, and seeing that my oppose would have absolutely no effect (:P) I'm going to support him. :) User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  17. βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ
  18. Why is he not an Admin already!? User:Jeyo/sig
  19. Has been a great help. Really adds to the Bricki experience! User:Wertys761/sig

Oppose

Neutral

  • Has had issues in the past, but definitely a great contributor to the content here. Can't quite support though User:NightblazeSaber/sig 00:53, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
I understand.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.